HPE7-A02 Aruba Certified Network Security Professional Exam Questions and Answers

To minimize disruption time if an AOS-CX switch reboots while implementing DHCP snooping and ARP inspection, you should save the IP-to-MAC bindings to external storage. This ensures that the DHCP snooping and ARP inspection tables, which are crucial for preventing spoofing attacks, are preserved across reboots. When the switch restarts, it can reload these bindings from the external storage, thereby maintaining network security and reducing the downtime associated with rebuilding these tables.

1.Preserving Bindings: Saving IP-to-MAC bindings to external storage ensures that these critical security tables are not lost during a reboot, maintaining network integrity.

2.Security Continuity: This practice helps to quickly restore security features like DHCP snooping and ARP inspection, minimizing the window of vulnerability.

3.Operational Efficiency: By preserving these bindings, the switch can resume normal operations faster, reducing disruption to network services.

Internet Key Exchange (IKE)/IKEv2 plays a crucial role in an HPE Aruba Networking client-to-site VPN by helping to negotiate the IPsec Security Association (SA) automatically and securely. IKE/IKEv2 handles the authentication and key exchange processes, ensuring that both the client and the VPN gateway can establish a secure IPsec tunnel.

1.SA Negotiation: IKE/IKEv2 automates the negotiation of the Security Association, which defines the parameters for the secure IPsec tunnel.

2.Secure Authentication: It provides a secure method for authenticating the communicating parties and exchanging cryptographic keys.

3.Efficiency: Using IKE/IKEv2 simplifies the setup and maintenance of secure VPN connections, enhancing the overall security and reliability of the VPN.

The exhibit reveals duplicate IP addresses detected for 10.1.140.6, associated with two different MAC addresses:

88:56:56:ab:c6:89

88:13:30:a3:02:00

Key observations:

Duplicate IP Address Detection:

The message "Duplicate IP address detected for 10.1.140.6" clearly indicates two devices claiming the same IP address.

This typically occurs when one device spoofs the MAC address of another device to intercept or disrupt traffic.

MAC Spoofing Context:

MAC spoofing is a tactic used to impersonate another device's hardware address to gain unauthorized access to a network.

By spoofing a legitimate IP-MAC pairing, an attacker can bypass security mechanisms or cause denial-of-service conditions.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option B (Mirroring Misconfigured): While mirroring misconfiguration can duplicate traffic, it does not lead to a "duplicate IP detected" alert.

Option C (Misconfigured DHCP): Misconfigurations usually result in DHCP conflicts, but they do not typically involve two different MAC addresses for the same IP.

Option D (ARP Poisoning/MITM): ARP poisoning involves falsified ARP tables, but it does not directly trigger duplicate IP address detection. Instead, ARP packets flood the network.

Conclusion:

The evidence strongly suggests MAC spoofing, as two different MAC addresses are claiming the same IP address (10.1.140.6). This behavior is typical of attempts to gain unauthorized access or disrupt network operations.

Applying a time range to a firewall rule on an AOS device fulfills the use case of enforcing the rule only during the specified time range. This allows administrators to control when specific firewall rules are active, which can be useful for implementing policies that only need to be in effect during certain hours, such as blocking or allowing access to specific resources outside of business hours.

1.Time-Based Enforcement: The firewall rule will be active only during the specified time range, ensuring that the rule's policies are enforced only when needed.

2.Use Case: This feature is useful for scenarios like limiting access to certain applications or websites during working hours, or enabling enhanced security measures during off-hours.

3.Flexibility: Provides flexibility in security policy management by allowing dynamic adjustment of rules based on time schedules.

Hub-Spoke VPN Configuration:

HPE Aruba Central SD-WAN Orchestrator enables hub-spoke topology where branch gateways (BGWs) connect to VPN concentrators (VPNCs) located at data centers.

A key step in configuring this is defining which VPNCs the BGWs will prefer for connectivity.

The DC Preference List is configured in the BGW groups to prioritize the data centers to which BGWs connect.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. VPN pools control IP allocation, not which branches connect to VPNCs.

Option B: Incorrect. IKE policies define key exchange mechanisms but are not part of the connection preference process.

Option C: Correct. Admins configure a DC preference list in BGW groups to determine connectivity priorities with VPNCs.

Option D: Incorrect. IPsec policies define encryption parameters at a global level, but this is not specific to the hub-spoke connection configuration.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation

Traffic Match Evaluation Order:

The rules are processed in sequential order, and the first rule that matches is applied.

The added rule only denies SSH traffic to 10.1.4.0/23. Since 10.1.11.42 is not within the 10.1.4.0/23 subnet, this rule does not apply.

Next Matching Rule:

Rule 2 permits traffic to the 10.1.6.0/23 network, but this does not include 10.1.11.42.

Rule 3 denies traffic to the broader 10.1.0.0/16 network and logs it. Since 10.1.11.42 falls under this range, this rule applies, and the traffic would be logged and dropped.

Logging and Denylist Actions:

The denylist action in the new rule only applies to SSH traffic to 10.1.4.0/23. Since the destination is outside that range, the denylist is not triggered.

References

Aruba AOS-10 Role and Firewall Rules Documentation.

HPE Aruba Central Configuration Best Practices Guide.

In a client-to-site VPN based on tunnel-mode IPsec, the remote clients and a gateway at the main site are responsible for the IPsec encapsulation. The remote clients initiate the VPN connection and encapsulate their traffic in IPsec, which is then decapsulated by the gateway at the main site.

1.IPsec Encapsulation: The remote clients encapsulate their traffic using IPsec protocols before sending it over the internet to the main site.

2.Gateway Role: The gateway at the main site receives the encapsulated traffic, decapsulates it, and forwards it to the internal network. Similarly, traffic from the main site to the remote clients is encapsulated by the gateway and decapsulated by the clients.

3.Security: This setup ensures that data is securely transmitted between the remote clients and the main site, protecting it from eavesdropping and tampering.

To better interpret the packets shown in the Wireshark capture, you should choose to decode UDP port 5555 packets as ARUBA_ERM and set the Aruba ERM Type to 0. This configuration will allow Wireshark to properly decode and display the Aruba-specific encapsulated remote mirroring (ERM) packets, providing a clearer understanding of the traffic.

1.Decoding Protocols: Selecting the correct protocol decoding in Wireshark ensures that the captured packets are interpreted correctly, displaying the relevant information.

2.Aruba ERM: The packets in the capture are likely encapsulated remote mirroring (ERM) packets specific to Aruba, which require proper decoding settings in Wireshark.

3.Clear Interpretation: By setting the Aruba ERM Type to 0 and decoding the packets as ARUBA_ERM, you can view the encapsulated data accurately.

To further protect the company from internal threats, you can recommend having the third-party SRX firewall send Syslogs to HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM). ClearPass can analyze these logs to detect potential security incidents and coordinate with network devices to respond to threats. By integrating Syslog data from the firewall, CPPM can identify malicious activities and take actions such as locking internal attackers out of the network or triggering specific security policies. This approach enhances the company's internal threat detection and response capabilities.

The Network Analytics Engine (NAE) in AOS-CX switches provides intelligent monitoring, troubleshooting, and performance analysis through predefined or custom scripts. Here’s an analysis of the guidelines for NAE:

A. Each switch model has a maximum number of supported monitors, and one agent might have multiple monitors.

Correct:

Each AOS-CX switch model has hardware and software limitations, including the number of agents and monitors it supports.

Monitors are data collection points for tracking specific metrics like interface statistics, CPU usage, or custom-defined parameters.

Agents are scripts that use monitors to evaluate data, trigger actions, or generate alerts.

Since one agent can have multiple monitors, the total number of monitors might impact the scalability of agents.

B. You can install multiple scripts on a switch, but you can deploy only one agent per script.

Incorrect:

Multiple agents can be deployed from the same script if they monitor different parameters or have different configurations.

The limitation is usually related to the total number of agents and monitors supported by the switch model, not the script itself.

C. The switch will permit you to deploy as many NAE agents as you want, but they might degrade the switch functionality.

Incorrect:

AOS-CX enforces hardware and software limits on the number of agents and monitors. These limits are designed to prevent degradation of switch performance.

You cannot deploy an unlimited number of agents, as the system enforces these restrictions.

D. When you use custom scripts, you can create as many agents from each script as you want.

Incorrect:

While you can use custom scripts to create agents, the total number of agents is subject to the switch's maximum supported limits.

The scalability of agents is still bound by hardware and software constraints, even with custom scripts.

References

HPE Aruba AOS-CX Network Analytics Engine Configuration Guide.

Aruba AOS-CX Switch Series Technical Specifications.

Best Practices for NAE Deployment in AOS-CX Networks.

When transitioning from Intrusion Detection System (IDS) mode to Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) mode, it’s critical to review and refine configurations to ensure legitimate traffic is not blocked. Here's the reasoning behind each option:

A. Disable traffic inspection and reboot before re-enabling traffic inspection with the new mode.

Incorrect:

Transitioning to IPS mode does not require a full reboot or disabling traffic inspection.

This step is unnecessary and could lead to downtime that impacts network operations.

B. Change the mode on one gateway at a time to establish a smoother transition period.

Incorrect:

While a phased approach might help in some large deployments, it does not directly address the potential for legitimate traffic to be blocked by IPS mode.

IPS operates in real-time, so misconfigured rules or policies need to be addressed before enabling IPS on any gateway.

C. Consider applying a stricter IPS policy to minimize issues during the transition period.

Incorrect:

A stricter IPS policy increases the likelihood of false positives, which could disrupt legitimate business-critical traffic.

During the transition, the focus should be on minimizing disruptions by fine-tuning policies, not making them stricter.

D. Check for legitimate traffic that has been flagged as a threat and allow list the associated rules.

Correct:

In IDS mode, the system only detects and logs suspicious traffic but does not block it. Reviewing these logs for false positives allows the organization to fine-tune policies and allow list legitimate traffic before transitioning to IPS mode.

By doing this, the company ensures that IPS mode will block actual threats while permitting legitimate traffic.

This is a proactive step to prevent unnecessary disruptions to normal operations when IPS mode is enabled.

References

HPE Aruba Gateway IDS/IPS Configuration Guide.

Best Practices for Transitioning from IDS to IPS Modes in Aruba Networks.

Aruba Network Threat Management Documentation.

Traffic Forwarding for APs:

In AOS-10, AP traffic forwarding can happen locally (bridged) or through tunnels to a gateway.

The VLAN settings on the "APs" role depend on whether the APs bridge the SSID traffic locally or forward it through a tunnel.

Option B: Correct. You need to know whether the traffic is bridged or tunneled to determine the VLAN assignments.

Option A: Incorrect. LURs/DURs affect role assignment but not VLAN settings for traffic forwarding.

Option C: Incorrect. Establishing tunnels with gateways is relevant to centralized traffic forwarding, not VLANs for bridged traffic.

Option D: Incorrect. AP IP addressing (static or DHCP) does not impact the VLAN for forwarded SSID traffic.

To assign managers to groups on the AOS-CX switch by name using HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) as a TACACS+ server, you should add the Aruba

service to the TACACS+ enforcement profile and set the Aruba-Admin-Role to the group name. This configuration ensures that the appropriate administrative roles are assigned to managers based on their group membership, allowing for role-based access control on the AOS-CX switches.

To prevent rogue OSPF routers in the network shown in the exhibit, the preferred configuration on Switch-2 is to configure OSPF authentication on Lag 1 in MD5 mode. This setup enhances security by ensuring that only routers with the correct MD5 authentication credentials can participate in the OSPF routing process. This method protects the OSPF sessions against unauthorized devices that might attempt to introduce rogue routing information into the network.

1.OSPF Authentication: Implementing MD5 authentication on Lag 1 ensures that OSPF updates are secured with a cryptographic hash. This prevents unauthorized OSPF routers from establishing peering sessions and injecting potentially malicious routing information.

2.Secure Communication: MD5 authentication provides a higher level of security compared to simple password authentication, as it uses a more robust hashing algorithm.

3.Applicability: Lag 1 is the primary link between Switch-1 and Switch-2, and securing this link helps protect the integrity of the OSPF routing domain.

For a company that lacks visibility into various types of user and IoT devices on its internal network, HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Device Insight (CPDI) is the recommended solution. CPDI provides comprehensive visibility and profiling of all devices connected to the network. It uses machine learning and AI to identify and classify devices, offering detailed insights into their behavior and characteristics. This enhanced visibility enables the security team to effectively monitor and manage network devices, improving overall network security and compliance.

Why MD5 Authentication on Lag 1 is Preferred:

Lag 1 is the primary link between Switch-2 and Switch-1, both of which are Layer 3 switches running OSPF.

By enabling MD5 authentication, OSPF routers exchange authenticated packets, preventing unauthorized or rogue OSPF routers from forming adjacencies or injecting routes.

MD5 is a secure authentication method and ensures the integrity and authenticity of OSPF communications.

Other Options Analysis:

A. Configure OSPF authentication on VLANs 10-19 in password mode: While configuring authentication on VLAN interfaces could secure VLAN-specific OSPF traffic, it is less effective because the main threat of rogue OSPF comes from unauthorized L3 devices connected via the backbone (Lag 1).

C. Disable OSPF entirely on VLANs 10-19: Disabling OSPF on these VLANs is not a preferred solution because OSPF is needed to route traffic in this design.

D. Configure passive-interface as the OSPF default and disable OSPF passive on Lag 1: While passive interfaces prevent OSPF from forming adjacencies, it does not directly prevent rogue routers. Passive mode only limits OSPF advertisements on specific interfaces.

Zero Trust Security is a security model that operates on the principle that no entity, whether inside or outside the network, should be trusted by default. Instead, every access request is thoroughly verified before granting access to resources. This model emphasizes protecting resources rather than merely securing the network perimeter, acknowledging that threats can originate both inside and outside the network.

1.Resource Protection: Zero Trust focuses on securing individual resources, assuming that threats can bypass traditional perimeter defenses.

2.Verification: Every access request is authenticated and authorized regardless of the source, ensuring that only legitimate users can access sensitive resources.

3.Modern Security Approach: This model aligns with the evolving threat landscape where insider threats and advanced persistent threats are common.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation

The configuration includes the command aaa authentication allow-fail-through, which specifies that if the TACACS+ server fails to respond (e.g., times out), the switch will proceed to the next authentication method in the sequence, which is local. In this scenario:

The switch first attempts to authenticate the user against the TACACS+ server.

When the TACACS+ server fails to respond, the switch falls back to local authentication.

The user netadmin is a local account configured on the switch and belongs to the operators group.

As a result, the user is successfully authenticated locally and is granted operator level access.

References

Aruba AOS-CX User Guide: Authentication fallback mechanisms.

TACACS+ fallback behavior for HPE Aruba switches.

To support the requirement for HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) to have HTTP User-Agent strings for profiling devices, you should add the CPPM server's IP address to the IP helper list in all client VLANs on routing switches. This configuration ensures that DHCP requests and other relevant client traffic are forwarded to CPPM, allowing it to capture HTTP User-Agent strings and use them for device profiling.

1.IP Helper Configuration: Adding CPPM to the IP helper list ensures that the switch forwards DHCP and other client traffic to CPPM, enabling it to gather necessary information for profiling.

2.User-Agent Strings: By receiving client traffic, CPPM can analyze HTTP headers and capture User-Agent strings, which provide valuable information about the client's device and browser.

3.Profiling Support: This approach supports the comprehensive profiling of devices, allowing CPPM to apply appropriate policies based on detailed device information.

OCSP (Online Certificate Status Protocol):

OCSP allows a device to check the revocation status of a specific certificate in real-time by querying the Certificate Authority (CA).

This is more efficient than downloading an entire Certificate Revocation List (CRL), as it only checks the status of one certificate.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. Root certificates are still required to validate the CA issuing the certificate.

Option B: Correct. OCSP checks the status of a single certificate for revocation.

Option C: Incorrect. Downloading all serial numbers is a function of a CRL, not OCSP.

Option D: Incorrect. OCSP does not handle certificate renewal; it only checks for revocation.

For a company that wants to apply a standard configuration to all AOS-CX switch ports and dynamically adjust their configuration based on the identity of the user or device that connects, the best approach is to have the switches download user-roles from HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM). This method centralizes the configuration of identity-based settings in CPPM, allowing it to dynamically assign roles and policies to switch ports based on authentication and authorization results. This ensures consistent and secure network access control tailored to each user or device.

To ensure that HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) applies tag-based rules to a client immediately after learning the client has that tag, verify that both 802.1X services have the "Profile Endpoints" option enabled and an appropriate Change of Authorization (CoA) profile selected in the Profiler tab. This setup ensures that when a device is profiled and tagged, CPPM can immediately enforce the updated policies through CoA.

1.Profile Endpoints: Enabling this option ensures that endpoint profiling is active, allowing CPPM to gather and use device information dynamically.

2.CoA Profile: Selecting an appropriate CoA profile ensures that CPPM can push policy changes immediately to the network devices, applying the new rules without delay.

3.Real-Time Enforcement: This configuration allows for the immediate application of new tags and associated policies, ensuring compliance with security requirements.

To ensure that HPE Aruba Networking APs (AOS-10) properly interact with HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) and dynamically update a client's enforcement profile based on new profile and posture information, you should enable Dynamic Authorization in the RADIUS server settings for CPPM. This allows ClearPass to send Change of Authorization (CoA) requests to the APs, prompting them to reapply the appropriate enforcement profiles based on updated information.

1.Dynamic Authorization: Enabling this feature allows ClearPass to dynamically push changes to the APs whenever there is new relevant information about a client's profile or posture.

2.Change of Authorization (CoA): This mechanism ensures that clients are assigned the correct enforcement profiles in real-time, based on the latest data.

3.Enhanced Policy Enforcement: This setup helps in maintaining accurate and up-to-date policy enforcement for clients on the network.

When setting up a ClearPass cluster, it is critical to ensure secure communication between the cluster nodes and the client devices. For this purpose, certain certificates must be properly configured.

1. Why HTTPS Requires a CA-Signed Certificate?

HTTPS communication is used for inter-cluster communication and for the web-based user interface that administrators use to manage the ClearPass cluster.

Before joining the cluster, it is strongly recommended to install a CA-signed HTTPS certificate on the Subscriber to ensure secure communication and prevent warnings/errors due to untrusted certificates.

Without a CA-signed certificate, the Subscriber might use a self-signed certificate, leading to security risks and lack of trust validation.

2. Analysis of Other Certificate Types

B. Database:

Incorrect: Database communications within ClearPass clusters are secured using internal certificates or keys. These are not user-facing and do not require a CA-signed certificate before joining the cluster.

C. RADIUS/EAP:

Incorrect: RADIUS/EAP certificates are important for client authentication, but they are not required on the Subscriber prior to cluster joining. These can be configured after the Subscriber is part of the cluster.

D. RadSec:

Incorrect: RadSec is an optional feature for secure RADIUS communication over TLS, and its certificate configuration is typically performed post-cluster setup.

Final Recommendation

To ensure secure cluster operations and seamless web-based management, a CA-signed HTTPS certificate should be installed on the Subscriber before it joins the ClearPass cluster.

References

ClearPass Deployment Guide for Version 6.9.

Best Practices for Certificate Management in ClearPass Clusters.

HPE Aruba ClearPass Cluster Configuration Guide.

To capture only the traffic sent in the mirroring session between an AOS-CX switch and a management station running Wireshark, you should apply a capture filter that isolates the specific traffic of interest. In this case, using the filter udp port 5555 will capture the traffic associated with the mirroring session. This is because AOS-CX switches typically use UDP port 5555 for mirrored traffic, ensuring that only the relevant mirrored packets are captured and excluding other traffic generated by the management station.

When Wireless IDS/IPS infrastructure detection reports RTS (Request to Send) and CTS (Clear to Send) rate anomalies triggered by neighboring APs, it is often an indication of unusual, but not necessarily malicious, behavior. These anomalies can be caused by neighboring APs operating normally but under specific conditions that trigger the alerts. Before assuming a security threat, it is recommended to tune the event thresholds to better match the environment and reduce false positives. This approach helps to distinguish between normal operations and potential DoS attacks.

To follow best security practices for 802.1X authentication settings in Windows domain clients:

Specify at least two server names under "Connect to these servers":

Admins should explicitly list trusted RADIUS server names (e.g., radius.example.com) to prevent the client from connecting to unauthorized or rogue servers.

This mitigates man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks where an attacker attempts to present their own RADIUS server.

Select the desired Trusted Root Certificate Authority and "Don't prompt users":

Select the Trusted Root CA that issued the RADIUS server's certificate. This ensures clients validate the correct server certificate during the EAP-TLS/PEAP authentication process.

Enabling "Don't prompt users" ensures end users are not confused or tricked into accepting certificates from untrusted servers.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option C: Incorrect. Wildcards in server names (e.g., *.example.com) weaken security and allow broader matching, increasing the risk of rogue servers.

Option D: Incorrect. Clearing "Use simple certificate selection" requires users to select certificates manually, which can lead to errors and usability issues. Simple certificate selection is recommended when properly configured.

Recommended Settings for Best Security Practices:

Server Validation: Specify the exact RADIUS server names in the "Connect to these servers" field.

Root CA Validation: Ensure only the correct Trusted Root Certificate Authority is selected.

User Prompts: Enable "Don't prompt users" to enforce automatic and secure authentication without user intervention.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation

Virtual Network Based Tunneling (VNBT) is the appropriate technology for this use case because:

Traffic Steering: VNBT enables traffic from specific clients or devices to be tunneled through a predefined network path. This allows traffic to pass through intermediate devices such as third-party security appliances.

Policy Enforcement: VNBT can be configured to route traffic based on roles, VLANs, or other policy definitions, ensuring that only specified traffic flows are redirected to the security appliance.

Scalability: This approach simplifies the redirection of traffic without requiring complex physical rewiring or changes to the underlying network topology.

Other Options:

MC-LAG: Primarily used for high-availability and redundancy in multi-chassis link aggregation scenarios, not for traffic redirection through appliances.

Network Analytics Engine (NAE): Used for monitoring and analytics, not traffic steering or forwarding.

Device Profiles: Helps automate switch port configurations for specific device types but does not handle traffic redirection.

References

AOS-CX Virtual Network Based Tunneling (VNBT) documentation.

Aruba Switch Architecture and Traffic Flow Control Best Practices Guide.

ClearPass Device Insight Integration:

To integrate ClearPass Device Insight (CPDI) with ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM), you must enable the Insight feature in the CPPM server configuration settings.

This ensures CPPM can share and receive profiling data with CPDI for device identification.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. Root CA certificates are not required for this integration.

Option B: Correct. Enabling Insight on CPPM is essential for the integration to function.

Option C: Incorrect. WMI, SSH, and SNMP are not part of the CPDI integration prerequisites.

Option D: Incorrect. The Data Collector token is relevant to Aruba Central, not CPDI integration.

RADIUS Change of Authorization (CoA):

CoA is triggered when ClearPass determines that a client’s posture status has changed (e.g., Healthy, Quarantine).

The RADIUS enforcement policy is where you configure actions and enforcement profiles that respond to these posture changes.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Correct. RADIUS enforcement policies are used to configure actions, including triggering CoA.

Option B: Incorrect. OnGuard settings configure posture agent behavior, not enforcement rules.

Option C: Incorrect. The posture policy evaluates compliance but does not trigger CoA.

Option D: Incorrect. WEBAUTH enforcement policies are for web-based authentication, not posture-related CoA.

To support the detection of denial of service (DoS) attacks on AOS-CX switches, deploying an NAE (Network Analytics Engine) agent to monitor control plane policing (CoPP) is the best approach. NAE agents provide real-time analytics and monitoring capabilities, allowing administrators to detect anomalies and potential DoS attacks, such as ping or ARP floods, more quickly and efficiently. Control plane policing helps protect the switch’s CPU from unnecessary or malicious traffic, and the NAE agent can alert administrators when thresholds are exceeded, providing a proactive measure to detect and mitigate DoS attacks.

Dynamic Authorization for Enforcement Profile Updates:

When CPPM receives updated client posture or profile data, it can initiate a Change of Authorization (CoA) to update enforcement profiles dynamically.

To support this:

Dynamic Authorization must be enabled on the switches.

CPPM must be configured as a dynamic authorization client to send CoA requests.

Option C: Correct. Dynamic authorization ensures that the switch can apply updated enforcement profiles based on new information from CPPM.

Option A: Incorrect. RADIUS accounting provides session updates but does not enable dynamic changes to enforcement profiles.

Option B: Incorrect. RADIUS track is for monitoring RADIUS server availability, not dynamic enforcement updates.

Option D: Incorrect. TACACS is not used for dynamic authorization; RADIUS handles this functionality.

Wireshark: Follow TCP Stream:

Wireshark provides an intuitive feature to filter and display a complete TCP conversation.

By right-clicking any packet within the conversation and selecting "Follow → TCP Stream", Wireshark isolates and displays the entire conversation.

This feature allows you to view the communication in a simplified, sequential manner, including requests and responses.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. Capture filters only apply during packet capturing, not for analyzing already saved packet captures.

Option B: Incorrect. Sorting packets helps with organizing data but does not isolate a complete conversation.

Option C: Incorrect. A capture filter for TCP port 5448 would have to be applied before capturing; it does not work for saved data.

Option D: Correct. Right-clicking a packet and choosing "Follow TCP Stream" is the simplest way to display the full conversation between 10.1.70.90 and 10.1.79.11 on port 5448.

Steps in Wireshark to Follow a TCP Stream:

Locate any packet within the desired conversation (e.g., between 10.1.70.90 and 10.1.79.11 on TCP port 5448).

Right-click on the packet.

Choose "Follow" → "TCP Stream".

Wireshark will display the entire TCP conversation, including both directions of communication.

This feature is especially useful when troubleshooting or analyzing detailed interactions between hosts.

Gateway Threat Count Alert

This alert indicates that the gateway has detected threats in traffic passing through it. HPE Aruba Networking Central provides tools to investigate and analyze these threats in detail.

Analysis of Each Option

A. Use HPE Aruba Networking Central tools to run a Network Check on the gateway with which the alert is associated:

Incorrect:

Network Check tools in Central are primarily used for connectivity and performance diagnostics, not for analyzing detected threats.

This does not provide insight into the specific threats triggering the Gateway Threat Count alert.

B. Use Live Monitoring on the gateway to download a packet capture of recent traffic flowing through the gateway:

Incorrect:

Live Monitoring and packet capture can provide raw traffic data, but interpreting this requires significant manual analysis.

The Gateway Threat Count alert already provides summarized threat insights that are easier to access via the threat list.

C. Check the threat list for the gateway associated with the alert. Access threat details and download packet info:

Correct:

The threat list is specifically designed to display detailed information about detected threats, such as their type, severity, and source/destination.

Administrators can access this list in Central for the affected gateway, view granular details, and even download associated packet data for deeper inspection.

D. Check the gateway's Audit Trail in HPE Aruba Networking Central for more details about the threats that triggered the alert:

Incorrect:

The Audit Trail tracks configuration changes and administrative actions, not the details of detected threats.

It is not relevant for investigating the Gateway Threat Count alert.

Final Recommendation

To gather more information about what caused the Gateway Threat Count alert to trigger, check the threat list for the associated gateway. This provides detailed threat information and the option to download packet data for further analysis.

References

HPE Aruba Networking Central Threat Management Guide.

Understanding Gateway IDS/IPS Alerts in Aruba Central Documentation.

Best Practices for Threat Investigation Using Aruba Central.

To integrate HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) with HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Device Insight (CPDI), one of the necessary tasks is to enable Insight in the CPPM server configuration settings. This configuration allows CPPM to communicate and share data with CPDI, facilitating the integration and enabling enhanced device profiling and policy enforcement capabilities.

1.Insight Enablement: Enabling Insight on the CPPM server allows it to leverage the data and capabilities of CPDI, integrating device profiling information into policy decisions.

2.Data Sharing: This integration ensures that CPPM can receive and use detailed device information from CPDI to make more informed policy enforcement decisions.

3.Configuration: Properly configuring the server settings to enable Insight ensures seamless communication and data flow between CPPM and CPDI.

When configuring 802.1X authentication on edge ports of an AOS-CX switch and assigning VoIP phones to a "voice" role, the correct approach is to configure VLAN 12 as the allowed trunk VLAN in the "voice" role. This setup ensures that traffic tagged for VLAN 12 is appropriately managed by the role applied to the VoIP phones. In AOS-CX switches, the role-based VLAN configuration allows for more granular control and ensures that the VoIP phones' traffic is handled correctly without altering the edge port settings, which typically operate with default settings for authentication.