ISA-IEC-62443 ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist Questions and Answers

Packet filter, application proxy, and stateful inspection are all recognized types or classes of firewalls in both IT and industrial control environments. A network monitor, on the other hand, is not considered a firewall but rather a tool for observing and analyzing network traffic. It does not provide firewall-like controls for blocking or allowing traffic.

For industrial networks, the most effective approach is to use IACS-specific firewalls that perform deep packet inspection (DPI) of industrial protocols (e.g., Modbus, DNP3, OPC UA).

“Industrial-specific firewalls with DPI capabilities can inspect control system protocols and enforce granular access control without disrupting time-sensitive operations.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013, SR 5.1 – Zone Boundary Protection

Unlike generic IT firewalls, IACS-specific firewalls:

Understand OT protocols

Enforce real-time constraints

Support deterministic traffic flows

A demilitarized zone (DMZ) in network architecture provides indirect (controlled and monitored) access to the Internet or untrusted networks, usually by isolating publicly accessible services (like web servers) from internal control networks. This prevents direct exposure of sensitive IACS assets to external threats. While DMZs can support secure data transfer, their primary function is segmentation and indirect access.

The Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model is a framework that describes the functions of a networking system. The OSI model categorizes the computing functions of the different network components, outlining the rules and requirement needed to support the interoperability of the software and hardware that make up the network1.

The OSI model consists of seven abstraction layers arranged in a top-down order: Physical, Data Link, Network, Transport, Session, Presentation, and Application. The Transport layer is the fourth layer in the OSI model, and it is responsible for ensuring reliable and efficient data transfer between the Network layer and the Session layer2. The Transport layer uses protocols such as Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram Protocol (UDP) to provide end-to-end communication services, such as error detection and correction, flow control, congestion control, and segmentation2.

The image that you sent shows a 3D representation of the OSI model, with the layers stacked on top of each other. The missing layer is the Transport layer, which is represented by a pink box with a white arrow pointing to it. The arrow is labeled “TCP, UDP”.

1: What is the OSI Model? 7 Network Layers Explained | Fortinet 2: What is OSI Model | 7 Layers Explained - GeeksforGeeks

Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) is no longer considered secure due to known vulnerabilities and cryptographic weaknesses. Modern standards require the use of newer versions of Transport Layer Security (TLS), and similarly, DES is deprecated for strong security. However, the best and most universally referenced example is SSL, as major industry and regulatory bodies recommend disabling SSL entirely in favor of TLS 1.2 or above.

 The ISA/IEC 62443 series of standards is organized into four main categories for documents, based on the topics and perspectives that they cover. These categories are: General, Policies and Procedures, System, and Component12.

General: This category covers topics that are common to the entire series, such as terms, concepts, models, and overview of the standards1. For example, ISA/IEC 62443-1-1 defines the terminology, concepts, and models for industrial automation and control systems (IACS) security3.

Policies and Procedures: This category focuses on methods and processes associated with IACS security, such as risk assessment, system design, security management, and security program development1. For example, ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 specifies the elements of an IACS security management system, which defines the policies, procedures, and practices to manage the security of IACS4.

System: This category is about requirements at the system level, such as security levels, security zones, security lifecycle, and technical security requirements1. For example, ISA/IEC 62443-3-3 specifies the system security requirements and security levels for zones and conduits in an IACS5.

Component: This category provides detailed requirements for IACS products, such as embedded devices, network devices, software applications, and host devices1. For example, ISA/IEC 62443-4-2 specifies the technical security requirements for IACS components, such as identification and authentication, access control, data integrity, and auditability.

The other options are not valid categories for documents in the ISA/IEC 62443 series of standards, as they either do not reflect the structure and scope of the standards, or they mix different aspects of IACS security that are covered by different categories. For example, end-user, integrator, vendor, and regulator are not categories for documents, but rather roles or stakeholders that are involved in IACS security. Assessment, mitigation, documentation, and maintenance are not categories for documents, but rather activities or phases that are part of the IACS security lifecycle. People, processes, technology, and training are not categories for documents, but rather elements or dimensions that are essential for IACS security.

ISA/IEC 62443-4-2 defines technical security requirements (TSRs) applicable to IACS components, including both embedded devices and software applications. The standard explicitly categorizes four types of components:

Embedded devices

Network components

Host devices

Software applications

“This part specifies the technical security requirements for IACS components, including embedded devices, network components, host devices, and software applications.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-4-2:2018, Clause 1 – Scope

This means Part 4-2 is not limited to just one component type — it broadly applies to multiple component classes. However, since the question focuses on embedded devices and software applications (both specifically included), option D is correct.

 A router and a VPN can be employed as barrier devices in a segmented network. A barrier device is a device that controls the flow of traffic between different network segments, based on predefined rules and policies1. A router is a device that forwards packets between different networks, based on their IP addresses2. A router can act as a barrier device by applying access control lists (ACLs) or firewall rules to filter or block unwanted or malicious traffic2. A VPN is a technology that creates a secure and encrypted tunnel between different networks, such as a remote site and a corporate network3. A VPN can act as a barrier device by encrypting the traffic and authenticating the users or devices that access the network3. A VPN can also prevent unauthorized access or eavesdropping by outsiders3.

Cybersecurity and physical security regulations are intended to provide guidance and requirements for protecting industrial control systems from various threats and risks. However, these regulations may face mixed resistance from different stakeholders for various reasons. One of the reasons is that there are a limited number of enforced cybersecurity and physical security regulations, especially at the international level. This means that some regions or countries may have more stringent or comprehensive regulations than others, creating inconsistencies and challenges for cross-border cooperation and compliance. Moreover, some regulations may be outdated or not aligned with the current best practices and standards, such as ISA/IEC 62443, which may limit their effectiveness and applicability. Therefore, some organizations may prefer to follow voluntary standards or frameworks, such as ISA/IEC 62443, rather than mandatory regulations, as they may offer more flexibility and adaptability to the specific needs and contexts of each industrial control system. References:

ISA/IEC 62443 Standards to Secure Your Industrial Control System, page 3

Using the ISA/IEC 62443 Standard to Secure Your Control System, page 9

ISA/IEC 62443 defines Security Levels (SL 0–4) as qualitative representations of the system’s ability to withstand different attacker capabilities. These definitions are consistent across system (3-3) and component (4-2) requirements.

Step 1: Understanding attacker models

SL 1 addresses casual or accidental misuse.

SL 2 addresses intentional violations using simple means and low skill.

SL 3 addresses intentional violations using sophisticated means with moderate skills.

SL 4 addresses highly sophisticated attackers with extended resources.

Step 2: Match requirement to definition

The question explicitly describes:

Intentional violations

Sophisticated means

Moderate skill level

This description directly aligns with the formal definition of SL 3.

Step 3: Why other SLs do not fit

SL 1 and SL 2 do not account for sophisticated attack techniques.

SL 4 assumes nation-state–level capability and extensive resources, which exceeds the stated threat.

Step 4: Risk-based targeting

ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 requires asset owners to select a Target Security Level (SL-T) based on risk assessment. When threats involve deliberate, technically capable attackers but not extreme resources, SL 3 is the appropriate target.

Therefore, the correct and standards-aligned answer is SL 3.

According to the ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 standard, a security zone is a grouping of systems and components based on their functional, logical, and physical relationship that share common security requirements. The primary objective of defining a security zone is to apply a consistent level of protection to the assets within the zone, based on their criticality and risk assessment. A security zone may contain assets from different vendors, different levels in the Purdue model, or different physical locations, as long as they have the same security requirements. A security zone may also be subdivided into subzones, if there are different security requirements within the zone. A conduit is a logical or physical grouping of communication channels connecting two or more zones that share common security requirements.

The primary objective of the IACS Security Program, as defined in ISA/IEC 62443-2-1, is to establish a structured and sustainable approach for the mitigation of cybersecurity risks throughout the IACS lifecycle.

“The purpose of the IACS security program is to manage and mitigate risk associated with cybersecurity threats. It defines policies, procedures, and practices to reduce the likelihood and impact of security incidents.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-2-1:2010, Clause 4.1 – Security Program Overview

The standard clearly distinguishes between risk mitigation and risk elimination — the latter being infeasible in industrial environments.

A National Standardization Body (NSB) represents a country's interests in international standards organizations like ISO or IEC, and is responsible for adopting and promoting these standards at the national level.

“A National Standardization Body (NSB) participates in the development of international standards, represents national interests, and facilitates the adoption of international standards as national standards.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-1-1:2007 – Definitions and Governance Roles

In contrast:

A Global SDO (Standards Development Organization) works at the international level

A Regulatory Agency enforces rules

An Industry Consortium is a private collaboration, not a national entity

ISA/IEC 62443 recommends using a firewall to segment and protect the plant floor (Operational Technology or OT network) from the rest of the company’s Information Technology (IT) networks. Firewalls enforce security policies by controlling and monitoring traffic, helping to prevent unauthorized access and potential threats from traversing between business and control networks. Hubs and switches do not provide security; routers may offer some basic filtering, but firewalls are explicitly designed for this purpose.

 IPSec is a commonly used protocol for managing secure data transmission over a VPN. IPSec stands for Internet Protocol Security and it is a set of standards that define how to encrypt and authenticate data packets that travel between two or more devices over an IP network. IPSec can operate in two modes: transport mode and tunnel mode. In transport mode, IPSec only encrypts the payload of the IP packet, leaving the header intact. In tunnel mode, IPSec encrypts the entire IP packet and encapsulates it in a new IP header. Tunnel mode is more secure and more suitable for VPNs, as it can protect the original source and destination addresses of the IP packet from eavesdropping or spoofing. IPSec uses two main protocols to provide security services: Authentication Header (AH) and Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP). AH provides data integrity and source authentication, but not confidentiality. ESP provides data integrity, source authentication, and confidentiality. IPSec also uses two protocols to establish and manage security associations (SAs), which are the parameters and keys used for encryption and authentication: Internet Key Exchange (IKE) and Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP). IKE is a protocol that negotiates and exchanges cryptographic keys between two devices. ISAKMP is a protocol that defines the format and structure of the messages used for key exchange and SA management.

 Safety management staff are stakeholders of the CSMS, which stands for Cybersecurity Management System. The CSMS is a framework for managing the cybersecurity of industrial automation and control systems (IACS) based on the ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 standard1. The CSMS defines the objectives, policies, metrics, and governance for the overall ICS security program2. The CSMS also includes the processes for risk assessment, security design, implementation, monitoring, and improvement3. Safety management staff are involved in the CSMS development and implementation, as they are responsible for ensuring the safety of the IACS and the people, environment, and assets that depend on it. Safety management staff need to coordinate with the security management staff to align the safety and security requirements, identify and mitigate the safety risks arising from cyber threats, and monitor and respond to safety incidents caused by cyberattacks. References:

1: ISA/IEC 62443-2-1: Establishing an Industrial Automation and Control Systems Security Program, ISA, 2010.

2: A Practical Approach to Adopting the IEC 62443 Standards - ISAGCA

3: ISA ISA-IEC-62443 ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist Online Training - Exam4Training

[4]: Using the ISA/IEC 62443 Standards to Secure Your Control System, ISA, 2018.

Per ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 and 62443-2-3, proper patch management is part of operational cybersecurity. For high-priority or critical security patches, the best practice is to apply the patch at the earliest possible opportunity, often during the next available unscheduled or scheduled outage.

“Asset owners shall define procedures for evaluating and applying patches based on criticality and potential impact. High-priority patches should be applied at the earliest opportunity, preferably at the first available system downtime.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-2-3:2015, Clause 6.1 – Patch Management Process

Waiting unnecessarily or skipping patches because "nothing is broken" is not acceptable in security-critical environments.

ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 intentionally avoids mandating a single risk assessment methodology. Instead, it defines requirements for the outcome and consistency of the risk assessment process.

Step 1: Methodology flexibility

The standard allows asset owners to use qualitative, quantitative, or hybrid methods based on system complexity, organizational maturity, and available data.

Step 2: Consistency requirement

What ISA/IEC 62443 does require is that the methodology be documented, repeatable, and consistent, particularly in how risks are ranked and compared.

Step 3: Security Level determination

Consistent risk ranking is essential for determining Target Security Levels (SL-T) and for justifying security decisions during audits.

Step 4: Why other options are incorrect

Avoiding standards undermines rigor. Using only qualitative methods may be insufficient. Mixing methodologies can introduce inconsistency and invalidate comparisons.

Therefore, the approach that best aligns with ISA/IEC 62443 is to follow any documented methodology that uses a consistent risk ranking scale.

 The ISASecure conformance certification program is managed by the Security Compliance Institute (ISCI), a non-profit organization established in 2007 by a group of industry stakeholders, including end users, suppliers, and integrators. ISCI’s mission is to provide a common industry-accepted set of device and process requirements that drive device security, simplifying procurement for asset owners and device assurance for equipment vendors12. References: 1: ISASecure - IEC 62443 Conformance Certification - Official Site 2: Certifications - ISASecure

ISA/IEC TR 62443-1-5 defines the rules for creating cybersecurity profiles. The key principle is preservation of standard integrity.

Step 1: Purpose of profiles

Profiles allow selection and scoping of existing requirements for specific industries or applications.

Step 2: Restriction on modification

The technical report explicitly states that no new security requirements may be added, and existing requirements must not be altered. This ensures interoperability, auditability, and certification consistency.

Step 3: Correct approach

Profiles may select, exclude, or contextualize requirements, but they cannot redefine them.

Therefore, Option C is correct.

Malware incidents are cited in ISA/IEC 62443 documentation and industry case studies as one of the primary causes of cyber-related production losses in process control environments. Such incidents can result in equipment shutdowns, process interruptions, and loss of visibility or control, leading directly to financial and operational impacts. While human error and hardware failure are also causes of downtime, in the context of “cyber-related” incidents, malware is the main contributor.

At layer 4 of the OSI model, also known as the transport layer, the application that will handle a packet inside a host is identified by a TCP/UDP port number. A port number is a 16-bit integer that is assigned to a specific application or service that runs on a host. Port numbers are used to multiplex and demultiplex the data streams that are exchanged between hosts and end systems. Multiplexing is the process of combining multiple data streams into one, while demultiplexing is the process of separating one data stream into multiple ones. Port numbers are part of the header of the transport layer protocol data unit (PDU), which is called a segment for TCP and a datagram for UDP. The header contains the source port number and the destination port number, which indicate the applications that are involved in the communication. For example, if a host sends a packet to another host using the HTTP protocol, which runs on port 80 by default, the source port number would be a random number chosen by the sender, and the destination port number would be 80. The receiver would then use the destination port number to demultiplex the packet and deliver it to the HTTP application.

Port numbers are divided into three ranges: well-known ports (0-1023), registered ports (1024-49151), and dynamic or private ports (49152-65535). Well-known ports are reserved for common and standardized applications and services, such as HTTP (80), FTP (21), and SSH (22). Registered ports are assigned by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) to specific applications and services that request them, such as Skype (49175) and Minecraft (25565). Dynamic or private ports are not assigned by any authority and can be used by any application or service that needs them, such as ephemeral ports that are used for temporary connections.

The other options are not valid identifiers for the application that will handle a packet inside a host at layer 4 of the OSI model. A TCP/UDP application ID is not a term that is used in the OSI model or the TCP/IP model. A TCP/UDP host ID is not a term that is used in the OSI model or the TCP/IP model, and it would be more appropriate for layer 3, which is the network layer, where the host is identified by an IP address. A TCP/UDP registry number is not a term that is used in the OSI model or the TCP/IP model, and it would be more appropriate for layer 5, which is the session layer, where the registry number is used to identify a session between two hosts.

Asymmetric (public) key algorithms are a type of cryptographic algorithms that require more than one key. Asymmetric key algorithms use a pair of keys, one for encryption and one for decryption, that are mathematically related but not identical1. The encryption key is usually made public, while the decryption key is kept private. This allows anyone to encrypt a message using the public key, but only the intended recipient can decrypt it using the private key1. Asymmetric key algorithms are also known as public key algorithms or public key cryptography1. Asymmetric key algorithms are used for various purposes, such as digital signatures, key exchange, and encryption2. Some examples of asymmetric key algorithms are RSA, Diffie-Hellman, ElGamal, and Elliptic Curve Cryptography2.

In ISA/IEC 62443-2-1, the Cyber Security Management System (CSMS) includes multiple categories. One of these is “Addressing Risk”, which is composed of 4 element groups, as outlined in Figure 3 – CSMS Elements of the standard.

The 4 element groups under "Addressing Risk" are:

Risk analysis and management

Security policy, organization, and awareness

Selected security countermeasures

Personnel security

“The Addressing Risk category of the CSMS consists of four element groups: risk analysis and management, security policy and awareness, selected countermeasures, and personnel security.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-2-1:2010, Figure 3 and Clause 4.2.2

ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 defines SP Element 1 – Organizational Security Measures as the set of governance, policy, and people-focused controls that establish the foundation of an IACS Security Program. These measures are organizational in nature and are intended to create accountability, awareness, and structured risk management.

Step 1: Scope of SP Element 1

SP Element 1 includes activities such as:

Security policy definition

Roles and responsibilities

Personnel security (e.g., background checks)

Security awareness and training

Supply chain security governance

These controls ensure that people, processes, and third-party relationships support cybersecurity objectives.

Step 2: Why malware protection does not belong here

Malware protection is a technical control, not an organizational measure. In ISA/IEC 62443, malware protection is addressed under SP Element 4 – Component Hardening, which focuses on endpoint protection, anti-malware mechanisms, and secure configurations.

Step 3: Why the other options are valid

Background checks are explicitly part of personnel security.

Supply chain security is a key organizational concern.

Security awareness training ensures staff understand their responsibilities.

Therefore, Malware protection is not listed under SP Element 1.

The ISASecure Integrated Threat Analysis (ITA) Program is a certification scheme that certifies off-the-shelf automation and control systems to the ISA/IEC 62443 series of standards1. The ITA Program consists of three main components2:

Software Development Security Assurance (SDSA): This component evaluates the security lifecycle and practices of the product supplier, such as security requirements, design, implementation, verification, and maintenance. The SDSA certification is based on the ISA/IEC 62443-4-1 standard.

Functional Security Assessment (FSA): This component verifies the security functions and features implemented in the product, such as identification and authentication, access control, encryption, audit logging, and security management. The FSA certification is based on the ISA/IEC 62443-4-2 standard.

Communications Robustness Testing (CRT): This component tests the resilience of the product against network attacks, such as denial-of-service, fuzzing, spoofing, and replay. The CRT certification is based on the ISA/IEC 62443-4-2 and ISA/IEC 62443-3-3 standards .

The Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) are managed and enforced by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), specifically through the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

“CFATS is a DHS regulatory program focused on security at high-risk chemical facilities to prevent terrorist exploitation of chemicals of interest.”

— Department of Homeland Security, CFATS Program Overview

These standards require facilities to perform vulnerability assessments and implement site security plans, aligning with principles from frameworks like ISA/IEC 62443.

The ISA/IEC 62443 standards series was originally developed by the International Society of Automation (ISA) and then adopted and published by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) as the IEC 62443 series. The IEC is the primary international body responsible for the ongoing development, maintenance, and publication of these standards, which are recognized globally for IACS cybersecurity. ANSI is a US standards body, NIST is responsible for US federal cybersecurity frameworks, and ETSI develops telecommunications standards for Europe, but IEC is the correct answer here.

ISA/IEC 62443 treats patch management as a risk-based organizational process, not a reactive or purely technical activity. Within 62443-2-1 and related asset owner requirements, patching is explicitly linked to risk assessment, operational impact, safety, and availability.

Step 1: Risk-based decision making

Patches introduce both benefits (vulnerability mitigation) and risks (downtime, instability, safety impact). ISA/IEC 62443 requires asset owners to evaluate patches based on their contribution to reducing cybersecurity risk while considering operational constraints.

Step 2: Integration into management processes

Patch management is part of configuration management, change management, and incident prevention. This ensures patches are tested, scheduled, approved, and deployed in a controlled manner consistent with business priorities.

Step 3: Avoiding incorrect approaches

Ignoring downtime and cost violates availability and safety objectives.

Waiting until after an attack contradicts preventive risk management.

Treating patching as purely technical ignores business, safety, and production impacts.

Step 4: Lifecycle alignment

ISA/IEC 62443 emphasizes that patching must be planned and executed throughout the Operate and Maintain phase as part of continuous risk reduction.

Therefore, the standard clearly requires patching to be handled as part of the broader risk management strategy, making Option C correct.

According to the ISA/IEC 62443 series, it is the asset owner's responsibility to determine what level of residual cybersecurity risk is acceptable after mitigation strategies are applied. This value becomes a key input in defining security levels and selecting controls.

“The asset owner is responsible for defining the tolerable residual risk and establishing acceptable security levels based on business impact and risk tolerance.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-3-2:2020, Clause 6.4.2 – Risk Evaluation Inputs

This forms the foundation for SL-T (Target Security Level) determination.

System availability is a core objective of ISA/IEC 62443, reflected in the Resource Availability (RA) foundational requirement. When frequent shutdowns occur, the standard directs attention to recovery and resilience mechanisms.

Step 1: Role of SP Element 8

SP Element 8 addresses backup, restore, and recovery capabilities. These activities ensure that systems can be restored quickly and reliably following failures, cyber incidents, or operational errors.

Step 2: Availability focus

Unexpected shutdowns often reveal weaknesses in backup integrity, restoration procedures, or recovery testing. ISA/IEC 62443 requires backups to be verified, protected, and periodically tested to ensure operational continuity.

Step 3: Why other SP Elements are secondary

Supply chain security, change control, and logging are important but do not directly restore operations after shutdowns. Backup and recovery directly impact downtime reduction.

Step 4: Operational outcome

Reviewing SP Element 8 activities helps identify gaps in restoration time objectives, backup completeness, and recovery procedures.

Thus, SP Element 8 – Backup restoration is the most relevant.

Maintenance service activities typically begin after the system is deployed and handed over to the asset owner. This is aligned with the Operation and Maintenance phase of the IACS lifecycle.

“Maintenance service providers typically become responsible for cybersecurity-related activities after the asset owner takes ownership of the system, following handover.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-2-4:2015, Clause 4.2.3 – Transition and Handover

Prior to handover, integrators and product suppliers manage the system. Maintenance providers take over only post-commissioning.

According to ISA/IEC 62443-1-1, a vulnerability is defined as “the potential for violation of security,” which means a weakness or gap in protection efforts that could be exploited by threats to gain unauthorized access or cause harm to an IACS. It does not specifically mean an event (B) or a result (D), and it is broader than just management flaws (A). The identification and management of vulnerabilities are key steps in risk assessment and mitigation in the 62443 framework.

ISA/IEC 62443 emphasizes that physical security and cybersecurity are interdependent and must complement each other to provide robust protection for industrial automation and control systems (IACS). Physical security measures (like locks, fences, access cards) protect against unauthorized physical access, while cybersecurity measures protect against digital threats. Both must work together; for example, a cyber attacker might gain physical access to a control cabinet or a physical intruder might exploit weak network security.

The second edition (2024) of ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 introduced a significant structural improvement by eliminating duplication of Information Security Management System (ISMS) requirements. The first edition (2010) contained content that overlapped substantially with ISO/IEC 27001-style ISMS controls, leading to redundancy and unnecessary implementation burden.

In the updated edition, ISA clarified that 62443-2-1 is not intended to replace a general-purpose ISMS, but rather to extend and specialize it for Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS). As a result, duplicated ISMS clauses were removed or streamlined, and the focus shifted to IACS-specific risks, operational realities, and lifecycle concerns.

This change improves:

Compatibility with existing enterprise ISMS implementations

Clarity of roles between IT security governance and OT security management

Practical adoption by asset owners operating both IT and OT environments

Importantly, supply chain security, lifecycle management, and organizational governance were not removed. Instead, they were better aligned and referenced to avoid redundancy. The PDCA model remains implicit but was not newly introduced in 2024.

Thus, the defining change is the elimination of duplicated ISMS requirements, making Option B correct.

OPC Unified Architecture (OPC UA) introduces a browsable namespace that supports hierarchical organization of data including folders, classes, methods, and object types. This is critical for structured access to real-time and historical data across heterogeneous control systems.

“OPC UA provides a flexible, secure, and platform-independent mechanism for exchanging information. Its browsable namespace allows structured navigation of nodes, types, and attributes in a hierarchical format.”

— OPC UA Specification, Part 3 – Address Space Model

This is a key improvement over OPC Classic, which was tightly coupled to DCOM and lacked standardized structures across systems.

 According to the ISA/IEC 62443-2-4 standard, a training and security awareness program should include all personnel who have access to the industrial automation and control system (IACS) or who are involved in its operation, maintenance, or management. This includes vendors and suppliers, employees, temporary staff, contractors, and visitors. The purpose of the program is to ensure that all personnel are aware of the security risks and policies related to the IACS, and that they have the necessary skills and knowledge to perform their roles in a secure manner. The program should also cover the roles and responsibilities of different personnel, the reporting procedures for security incidents, and the best practices for security hygiene. References:

ISA/IEC 62443-2-4:2015 - Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 2-4: Security program requirements for IACS service providers1

ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist Training Course2

Phishing is a type of cyberattack that relies on a human weakness to succeed. Phishing is the practice of sending fraudulent emails or other messages that appear to come from a legitimate source, such as a bank, a government agency, or a trusted person, in order to trick the recipient into revealing sensitive information, such as passwords, credit card numbers, or personal details, or into clicking on malicious links or attachments that may install malware or ransomware on their devices. Phishing is a common and effective way of compromising the security of industrial automation and control systems (IACS), as it can bypass technical security measures by exploiting the human factor. Phishing can also be used to gain access to the IACS network, to conduct reconnaissance, to launch further attacks, or to cause damage or disruption to the IACS operations. The ISA/IEC 62443 series of standards recognize phishing as a potential threat vector for IACS and provide guidance and best practices on how to prevent, detect, and respond to phishing attacks. Some of the recommended countermeasures include:

Educating and training the IACS staff on how to recognize and avoid phishing emails and messages, and how to report any suspicious or malicious activity.

Implementing and enforcing policies and procedures for email and message security, such as using strong passwords, verifying the sender’s identity, and not opening or clicking on unknown or unsolicited links or attachments.

Applying technical security controls, such as antivirus software, firewalls, spam filters, encryption, and authentication, to protect the IACS devices and network from phishing attacks.

Monitoring and auditing the IACS network and devices for any signs of phishing attacks, such as anomalous or unauthorized traffic, connections, or activities, and taking appropriate actions to contain and mitigate the impact of any incidents. References:

ISA/IEC 62443-1-1:2009, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 1-1: Terminology, concepts and models1

ISA/IEC 62443-2-1:2009, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 2-1: Establishing an industrial automation and control systems security program2

ISA/IEC 62443-2-4:2015, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 2-4: Security program requirements for IACS service providers3

ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 3-3: System security requirements and security levels4

ISA/IEC 62443-4-2:2019, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 4-2: Technical security requirements for IACS components5

A Wide Area Network (WAN) is a communications system that covers a large geographic area, such as a city, a country, or even several countries or continents1. WANs are often used to connect local area networks (LANs) and other types of networks together, so that users and computers in one location can communicate with users and computers in other locations2. WANs use various communication infrastructures, such as public telephone lines, undersea cables, and communication satellites, to transmit data over long distances1. WANs are typically established with leased telecommunication circuits or less costly circuit switching or packet switching methods2. WANs are often built by Internet service providers, who provide connections from an organization’s LAN to the Internet2. The Internet itself may be considered a WAN2. References: Hardware and network technologies - CCEA LAN and WAN - BBC, Wide area network - Wikipedia.

According to the ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 standard, security policy, organization, and awareness is one of the four foundational requirements for an IACS security management system. It defines the “policies, procedures, and organizational structure necessary to support the security program” 1. One of the elements of this requirement is staff training and security awareness, which involves “providing appropriate security education and training to all personnel who have access to or are responsible for IACS components” 1. This element aims to ensure that the staff are aware of the security risks, policies, and procedures, and are able to perform their roles and responsibilities in a secure manner. Staff training and security awareness can include topics such as security principles, threats and vulnerabilities, incident response, password management, physical security, and social engineering 2. References:

ISA/IEC 62443 Series of Standards - ISA

Security of Industrial Automation and Control Systems - ISAGCA

Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) are both commonly used protocols for managing secure data transmission on the Internet. DTLS is a variant of SSL that is designed to work over datagram protocols such as UDP, which are used for real-time applications such as voice and video. SSL is a protocol that provides encryption, authentication, and integrity for data transmitted over TCP, which is used for reliable and ordered delivery of data. Both DTLS and SSL use certificates and asymmetric cryptography to establish a secure session between the communicating parties, and then use symmetric cryptography to encrypt the data exchanged. DTLS and SSL are widely used in web browsers, email clients, VPNs, and other applications that require secure communication over the Internet. References:

ISA/IEC 62443 Standards to Secure Your Industrial Control System, Module 3: Introduction to Cryptography, pages 3-5 to 3-7

Using the ISA/IEC 62443 Standards to Secure Your Control System, Chapter 6: Securing Communications, pages 125-126

Ethernet/IP is an industrial network protocol that adapts the Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) to standard Ethernet. CIP is an object-oriented protocol that provides a unified communication architecture for various industrial automation applications, such as control, safety, security, energy, synchronization and motion, information and network management. CIP defines a set of messages and services for interacting with devices and data on the network, as well as a set of device profiles for consistent implementation of automation functions across different products. Ethernet/IP uses the transport and control protocols of standard Ethernet, such as TCP/IP and IEEE 802.3, to define the features and functions for its lower layers. Ethernet/IP also uses UDP to transport I/O messages and supports various network topologies, such as star, linear, ring and wireless. Ethernet/IP is one of the leading industrial protocols in the United States and is widely used in a range of industries, such as factory, hybrid and process. Ethernet/IP is managed by ODVA, Inc., a global trade and standards development organization. References:

EtherNet/IP - Wikipedia

EtherNet/IP | ODVA Technologies | Industrial Automation

The selection of countermeasures is driven by the output from a risk assessment, which identifies the risks and their associated likelihood and consequences for each zone and conduit in the industrial automation and control system (IACS). The risk assessment also determines the target security level (SL-T) for each zone and conduit, which represents the desired level of protection against the identified threats. The countermeasures are then selected based on the SL-T and the existing security level (SL-A) of the zone and conduit, as well as the cost and feasibility of implementation. The countermeasures should aim to reduce the risk to an acceptable level by increasing the SL-A to meet or exceed the SL-T. References: ISA/IEC 62443-3-2:2018 - Security risk assessment for system design, ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013 - System security requirements and security levels, ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist Training Course

ISA/IEC 62443 is an international consensus standard, not a regulation. The standard itself clearly distinguishes between voluntary standards and legally enforceable regulations. By default, compliance with standards such as ISA/IEC 62443 is voluntary, unless they are explicitly referenced in laws, regulations, contracts, or regulatory frameworks.

Step 1: Nature of standards

Standards are developed to provide agreed-upon best practices and requirements based on expert consensus. ISA/IEC 62443 provides structured, auditable requirements for securing IACS, but it does not carry legal force on its own.

Step 2: Relationship to law and regulation

Governments or regulators may reference standards within regulations, making compliance mandatory in specific contexts. However, the enforceability in such cases comes from the law or contract, not from the standard itself.

Step 3: Role in liability and due diligence

While compliance is voluntary, courts may consider standards as evidence of industry best practice when evaluating negligence or due diligence. This does not make them legally binding, but it does make them highly influential.

Step 4: Why other options are incorrect

Standards do not impose criminal penalties, are not automatically legally binding, and are often considered by courts.

Therefore, the most accurate statement is that compliance with standards is voluntary.

According to the ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 standard, implementing countermeasures is one of the steps in the security risk assessment for system design. The standard defines a comprehensive set of engineering measures to guide organizations through the process of assessing the risk of a particular industrial automation and control system (IACS) and identifying and applying security countermeasures to reduce that risk to tolerable levels. The standard recommends the following steps for implementing countermeasures:

Establish the risk tolerance: This step involves determining the acceptable level of risk for the organization and the system under consideration, based on the business objectives, legal and regulatory requirements, and stakeholder expectations. The risk tolerance can be expressed as a target security level (SL-T) for each zone or conduit in the system.

Select common countermeasures: This step involves selecting the appropriate security countermeasures for each zone or conduit, based on the SL-T and the existing security level (SL-A) of the system. The standard provides a list of common countermeasures for each security level, covering the domains of physical security, network security, system security, and application security. The selected countermeasures should be documented and justified in the security risk assessment report. References: ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Series Designated as IEC Horizontal Standards, Cybersecurity Risk Assessment According to ISA/IEC 62443-3-2

The SL-T (BPCS Zone) vector {2 2 0 1 3 1 3} represents the Target Security Level (SL-T) across each of the seven Foundational Requirements (FRs) in ISA/IEC 62443-3-3.

Each number in the vector corresponds to a security level (0–4) assigned to a particular FR, as follows:

FR1 – Identification & Authentication Control (IAC): 2

FR2 – Use Control (UC): 2

FR3 – System Integrity (SI): 0

FR4 – Data Confidentiality (DC): 1

FR5 – Restricted Data Flow (RDF): 3

FR6 – Timely Response to Events (TRE): 1

FR7 – Resource Availability (RA): 3

“Security levels are represented as vectors of seven values, each corresponding to the target security level for a foundational requirement (FR).”

— ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013, Annex A – SL Vector Format

This allows zone-specific tailoring based on risk — some FRs may require SL 3, others SL 0, depending on system criticality and exposure.

The formula for risk in ISA/IEC 62443 is typically expressed as:

Risk = Threat × Vulnerability × Consequence

This means that risk is a product of the likelihood that a threat will exploit a vulnerability and the impact (consequence) if that event occurs. This formula is consistently used in both the general information security domain and explicitly referenced in the ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 standard in the context of IACS risk assessments.

The ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 standard specifies that a key output of the risk assessment process is the establishment of Target Security Levels (SL-Ts) for each security zone or conduit. These target levels define the minimum cybersecurity requirements necessary to mitigate identified risks to an acceptable level. Total risk elimination is generally not possible; instead, setting SL-Ts allows for structured, risk-based implementation of security controls.

ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 emphasizes the importance of the ongoing evaluation of organizational responsibilities and training as part of continuous improvement within the CSMS. Periodic assessment ensures that personnel remain aware of their roles, are adequately trained, and that the program adapts to changes in the environment, technology, or threat landscape. The standard discourages keeping responsibilities static or expanding without control; instead, it advocates for regular reviews and updates.

The Ukrainian power grid cyberattack (2015 and 2016 incidents) is widely documented as a “nation state” attack. It was attributed to a highly skilled, well-resourced group with nation-state backing, and demonstrated the ability to compromise, disrupt, and remotely control industrial systems in critical infrastructure. This attack is discussed in ISA/IEC 62443 training and guidance as an example of advanced persistent threat (APT) activity targeting industrial control systems.

ISA/IEC 62443 frequently references common industrial protocols when discussing network security, segmentation, and secure communications. MODBUS TCP/IP is one of the most widely deployed industrial protocols and is explicitly recognized as operating over TCP port 502.

Step 1: Protocol context

MODBUS TCP/IP is the Ethernet-based adaptation of the MODBUS protocol, enabling communication between PLCs, HMIs, and SCADA systems over IP networks. Unlike HTTP or HTTPS, MODBUS does not include native authentication or encryption.

Step 2: Port assignment

The standard TCP port assigned to MODBUS TCP/IP is 502, which is well known and commonly targeted by attackers. ISA/IEC 62443 highlights that well-known ports increase exposure and therefore require compensating controls such as firewalls, segmentation, and deep packet inspection.

Step 3: Security implications

Because port 502 traffic can carry control commands directly affecting physical processes, the standard emphasizes controlling and monitoring communications using this port within defined zones and conduits.

Step 4: Why other options are incorrect

Port 21 is used for FTP

Port 80 for HTTP

Port 443 for HTTPS

Thus, the correct and standards-aligned answer is 502.

The primary responsibility of the network layer of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model is to forward packets, including routing through intermediate routers. The network layer is the third layer from the bottom of the OSI model, and it is responsible for maintaining the quality of the data and passing and transmitting it from its source to its destination. The network layer also assigns logical addresses to devices, such as IP addresses, and uses various routing algorithms to determine the best path for the packets to travel. The network layer operates on packets, which are units of data that contain the source and destination addresses, as well as the payload. The network layer forwards packets from one node to another, using routers to switch packets between different networks. The network layer also handles host-to-host delivery, which means that it ensures that the packets reach the correct destination host.

The other choices are not correct because:

B. Gives transparent transfer of data between end users. This is the responsibility of the transport layer, which is the fourth layer from the bottom of the OSI model. The transport layer provides reliable and error-free data transfer between end users, using protocols such as TCP and UDP. The transport layer operates on segments, which are units of data that contain the source and destination port numbers, as well as the payload. The transport layer also handles flow control, congestion control, and multiplexing.

C. Provides the rules for framing, converting electrical signals to data. This is the responsibility of the data link layer, which is the second layer from the bottom of the OSI model. The data link layer provides the means for transferring data between adjacent nodes on a network, using protocols such as Ethernet and WiFi. The data link layer operates on frames, which are units of data that contain the source and destination MAC addresses, as well as the payload. The data link layer also handles error detection, error correction, and media access control.

D. Handles the physics of getting a message from one device to another. This is the responsibility of the physical layer, which is the lowest layer of the OSI model. The physical layer provides the means for transmitting bits over a physical medium, such as copper wire, fiber optic cable, or radio waves. The physical layer operates on bits, which are the smallest units of data that can be either 0 or 1. The physical layer also handles modulation, demodulation, encoding, decoding, and synchronization.

A control system, particularly in the context of IACS, is defined as a collection of hardware and software components used to monitor and control industrial processes. This includes PLCs, RTUs, SCADA software, HMIs, and communication networks.

“Control system: A set of hardware and software components that work together to monitor and control industrial or process operations.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-1-1:2007, Clause 3.3.5 – Terminology

While the other options describe security functions or consequences, only Option C accurately describes what a control system is.

IT systems and IACS have different security priorities, requirements, and challenges. According to the ISA/IEC 62443 standards, the security priority for IT systems is confidentiality, which means protecting the data from unauthorized access or disclosure. The security priority for IACS is integrity, which means ensuring the accuracy and consistency of the data and the functionality of the system. A loss of integrity in an IACS can have severe consequences, such as physical damage, environmental harm, or human injury. Therefore, IACS cybersecurity must address safety issues, which are not typically considered in IT security. Safety is the ability of the system to prevent or mitigate hazardous events that can cause harm to people, property, or the environment. The ISA/IEC 62443 standards provide guidance and best practices for ensuring the safety and security of IACS, as well as the availability and reliability of the system. Availability is the ability of the system to perform its intended function when required, and reliability is the ability of the system to perform its intended function without failure. These properties are also important for IT systems, but they may have different trade-offs and implications for IACS. For example, an IACS may have stricter performance and availability requirements than an IT system, as a delay or disruption in the IACS operation can affect the industrial process and its outcomes. Additionally, an IACS may have longer equipment lifetimes and less frequent maintenance windows than an IT system, which can make patching and updating more difficult and risky. Furthermore, an IACS may use different technologies and architectures than an IT system, such as legacy devices, proprietary protocols, or specialized hardware. These factors can create compatibility and interoperability issues, as well as increase the attack surface and complexity of the IACS. Therefore, IT security solutions and practices may not be sufficient or suitable for IACS, and they may need to be adapted or supplemented by IACS-specific security measures. The ISA/IEC 62443 standards address these differences and provide a comprehensive framework for securing IACS throughout their lifecycle.

The NIST CSF is a voluntary framework that provides a set of standards, guidelines, and best practices to help organizations manage cybersecurity risks. The NIST CSF consists of five core functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. Each function is further divided into categories and subcategories that describe specific outcomes and activities. The NIST CSF also provides informative references that link the subcategories to existing standards, guidelines, and practices that can help organizations achieve the desired outcomes. The informative references are not mandatory or exhaustive, but rather serve as examples of possible sources of guidance. The ISA 62443 standards are used as informative references in the NIST CSF v1.0 for several subcategories, especially in the Protect and Detect functions. The ISA 62443 standards are a series of standards that provide a framework for securing industrial automation and control systems (IACS). The ISA 62443 standards cover various aspects of IACS security, such as terminology, concepts, requirements, policies, procedures, and technical specifications. The ISA 62443 standards are aligned with the NIST CSF in terms of the core functions and the risk-based approach. Therefore, the ISA 62443 standards can provide useful guidance and best practices for organizations that use IACS and want to implement the NIST CSF. References:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework - Official Site1

Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity - Version 1.02

ISA/IEC 62443 Standards - Official Site3

ISA/IEC 62443 Compliance & Scoring | Centraleyes4

Authorization security policy is the primary factor that determines access privileges for user accounts. Authorization security policy is the function of specifying access rights or privileges to resources, which is related to general information security and computer security, and to access control in particular1. Authorization security policy defines who can access what resources, under what conditions, and for what purposes. Authorization security policy should be aligned with the business objectives and security requirements of the organization, and should be enforced by appropriate mechanisms and controls. Authorization security policy should also be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect changes in the environment, threats, and risks2. Authorization security policy is an essential part of the ISA/IEC 62443 standard, which provides a framework for securing industrial automation and control systems (IACS). The standard defines four security levels (SL) that represent the degree of protection against threats, and specifies the security capabilities that should be implemented for each SL. The standard also provides guidance on how to conduct a security risk assessment, how to define security zones and conduits, and how to apply security policies and procedures to the IACS environment34 . References: https://bing.com/search?q=authorization+security+policy

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/authorization/policies?view=aspnetcore-7.0

ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 defines structured patch management phases, including evaluation, testing, deployment, and rollback considerations.

Step 1: Patch testing objectives

The patch testing phase focuses on ensuring that patches are authentic, safe, and compatible with the operational environment.

Step 2: Included activities

File authenticity verifies that patches are genuine and unaltered

Qualification and verification ensure patches do not disrupt operations

Notification ensures relevant stakeholders are informed of test results

Step 3: Why removal procedure is excluded

Removal or rollback procedures are part of deployment and recovery planning, not patch testing itself.

Thus, the correct answer is Removal procedure.

ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 focuses on the cybersecurity risk assessment process, including:

Identifying zones and conduits

Determining the Target Security Levels (SL-T)

Designing the IACS architecture based on risk-based zoning

“Part 3-2 defines a process for conducting cybersecurity risk assessments and designing system architectures that incorporate zones and conduits based on those risks.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-3-2:2020, Clause 5 – Risk Assessment Process

This part bridges the gap between risk evaluation and technical implementation.

Tabletop exercises simulate cybersecurity incidents in a non-disruptive setting, helping teams test and improve their incident response plans and communication protocols.

“Tabletop exercises allow personnel to rehearse roles, responsibilities, and actions in a simulated event scenario. This enhances coordination, preparedness, and decision-making during actual incidents.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-2-1:2010, Clause 4.3.3.3 – Incident Response Preparedness

They are essential for verifying that the incident handling process (SP Element 7) is both understood and effective.

According to ISA/IEC 62443-1-1:2007 (Terminology, Concepts, and Models), the functional levels of the Industrial Automation and Control System (IACS) are derived from the Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture (PERA). These levels are defined as follows:

Level

Function

Description

Level 0

Process

The actual physical process, including sensors and actuators.

Level 1

Basic Control

Devices responsible for direct control, such as PLCs and RTUs.

Level 2

Area Supervisory Control

Supervisory systems such as HMIs and SCADA, responsible for monitoring/control.

Level 3

Site Manufacturing Operations Management

Operations management systems such as MES, production scheduling, and workflow.

Level 4

Business Planning and Logistics

Enterprise-level systems such as ERP, supply chain, and logistics.

Analysis of Each Option:

Option A: Level 1: Supervisory Control

Incorrect. Level 1 is defined as Basic Control, not Supervisory Control. Supervisory functions appear at Level 2.

Option B: Level 2: Quality Control

Incorrect. Level 2 is defined as Area Supervisory Control, not Quality Control.

Option C: Level 3: Operations Management

Correct. Level 3 is specifically identified as Operations Management, which includes manufacturing execution and scheduling functions.

Option D: Level 4: Process

Incorrect. Level 4 corresponds to Business Planning and Logistics. The Process is represented at Level 0.

The ISA99 Committee (which developed ISA/IEC 62443) defines the scope and impact of IACS cybersecurity incidents in terms of negative consequences.

Step 1: Recognized consequences

The standard identifies consequences such as:

Financial losses

Environmental damage

Endangerment of public or worker safety

Loss of proprietary or sensitive information

Step 2: Purpose of defining consequences

These consequences justify why IACS cybersecurity must prioritize availability, integrity, and safety in addition to confidentiality.

Step 3: Why increased product sales is excluded

“Increased product sales” is not a negative consequence and is not mentioned anywhere in the ISA99 scope as a result of a cybersecurity compromise.

Therefore, the correct answer is Increased product sales.

ISA/IEC 62443-4-1 provides a framework for secure product development lifecycle (SDL). One of its primary goals is to ensure that security practices are integrated consistently and systematically throughout the product's development process.

“The objective of this part is to define a secure development lifecycle process that results in a consistent and repeatable approach to building secure products.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-4-1:2018, Clause 1 – Scope

While all listed items may contribute to security, the core intent of Part 4-1 is to ensure an aligned, structured development process.

The Triton (also known as Trisis) malware specifically targeted and compromised Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS), disabling the emergency shutdown capabilities at a petrochemical plant. This attack demonstrated that safety systems, once considered isolated and secure, are vulnerable to sophisticated, targeted cyberattacks. Neither Zeus, Stuxnet, nor WannaCry had this specific impact on emergency shutdown safety systems.

CCSC stands for Common Component Security Criteria, as defined in ISA/IEC 62443-4-2. These are a standardized set of technical security requirements that apply across all component types (e.g., embedded devices, software apps, network components).

“CCSCs represent baseline technical security requirements that are commonly applicable to all IACS components, regardless of their type.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-4-2:2018, Clause 4.1 – Common Component Security Criteria

These requirements support consistency and interoperability in component security evaluations.

ISA/IEC 62443 is developed within the international standards system, where national participation is coordinated through National Standardization Bodies (NSBs). These organizations represent their country’s interests in international standards committees and manage the adoption of international standards at the national level.

Step 1: Role of a National Standardization Body

An NSB acts as the official representative of a country within international standards organizations such as IEC and ISO. It coordinates national input, votes on standards, and nominates experts to technical committees.

Step 2: Adoption of international standards

NSBs are responsible for adopting international standards as national standards, often with minimal or no modification. This enables consistent global alignment while supporting local implementation.

Step 3: Why other options are incorrect

Global SDOs develop standards internationally but do not represent individual countries.

Regulatory agencies enforce laws, not standards.

Industry consortia represent private-sector interests, not national positions.

Thus, the correct role is National Standardization Body.