JN0-683 Data Center Professional (JNCIP-DC) Exam Questions and Answers

Understanding the Scenario:

EVPN-VXLAN deployments often involve scenarios where multiple tenants or applications require overlapping VLAN IDs, which can be managed using the mac-vrf routing instance type. This allows you to segregate traffic within the same VLAN ID across different tenants.

Host-facing Interface Configuration:

A. Host-facing interfaces must be configured using a service-provider style configuration:This is correct. In mac-vrf configurations, host-facing interfaces (those connecting end devices) typically follow a service-provider style configuration, where each customer or tenant's traffic is isolated even if overlapping VLAN IDs are used.

B. Host-facing interfaces must be configured using enterprise-style configuration:This is incorrect for mac-vrf instances because enterprise-style configurations are more common in simpler, less segmented networks.

Routing Instance Service Type:

D. The routing-instance service type can be VLAN-based:This is correct. The service type in mac-vrf can indeed be VLAN-based, which is particularly useful in scenarios where VLAN ID overlap is needed between different tenants or services.

Data Center References:

The mac-vrf instance type is powerful for handling complex multi-tenant environments in EVPN-VXLAN, especially when dealing with overlapping VLAN IDs across different segments of the network.

Telemetry Methods in Junos:

Telemetry is used to collect and report data from network devices. For high-frequency statistics reporting, such as every five seconds, you need a telemetry method that supports this level of granularity and real-time monitoring.

Junos Native Sensors:

Option C:Native Sensors in Junos provide detailed, high-frequency telemetry data, including TX and RX traffic statistics for interfaces. They are designed to offer real-time monitoring with customizable sampling intervals, making them ideal for the five-second reporting requirement.

Conclusion:

Option C:Correct—Native Sensors in Junos are capable of providing the required high-frequency telemetry data every five seconds.

Issue Analysis:

The problem in the exhibit suggests a mismatch in configuration parameters between Leaf-1 and Leaf-2, leading to communication issues between hosts connected to these leaf devices.

Configuration Mismatches:

Service-ID:Leaf-1 has service-id 1 configured, while Leaf-2 does not have this parameter. For consistency and proper operation, the service-id should be the same across both leaf devices.

VRF Target:Leaf-1 is configured with vrf-target target:65000:1, while Leaf-2 is configured with vrf-target target:65000:2. To allow proper VRF import/export between the two leafs, these should match.

Corrective Actions:

C. Configure the set switch-options vrf-target target:65000:1 parameter on Leaf-2:This aligns the VRF targets between the two leaf devices, ensuring they can correctly import and export routes.

E. Configure the set switch-options service-id 1 parameter on Leaf-2:This ensures that both Leaf-1 and Leaf-2 use the same service ID, which is necessary for consistency in the EVPN-VXLAN setup.

Data Center References:

Correct configuration of VRF targets and service IDs is critical in EVPN-VXLAN setups to ensure that routes and services are correctly shared and recognized between different devices in the network fabric.

BGP in IP Fabric:

In an IP fabric, Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is used to manage the routing between leaf and spine devices. Each device can have the same or different Autonomous System (AS) numbers depending on the network design.

Multipath Multiple-AS:

Option B:If every device in the fabric has a different AS number, then enabling Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) routing requires the multipath multiple-as statement. This configuration allows BGP to consider multiple paths across different AS numbers as equal cost, enabling efficient load balancing across the network.

Same AS Number Configuration:

Option A:It's possible for all leaf devices to use the same AS number in an IP fabric, which simplifies the configuration. EBGP (External BGP) will still function correctly in this setup because BGP considers the peering relationship rather than strictly enforcing different AS numbers in this specific use case.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—This statement is essential for enabling ECMP in a multi-AS environment.

Option A:Correct—Leaf devices can share the same AS number without needing special EBGP configuration.

Issue Overview:

The leaf devices in an IP fabric using eBGP are advertising and receiving all routes, but the routes are not being installed in the routing table and are marked as hidden. Thistypically indicates an issue with the BGP configuration, particularly with next-hop handling or AS path concerns.

Corrective Actions:

B. You need to configure a next-hop self policy:This action ensures that the leaf devices modify the next-hop attribute to their own IP address before advertising routes to their peers. This is particularly important in eBGP setups where the next-hop may not be directly reachable by other peers.

D. You need to configure multipath multiple-as:This setting allows the router to accept multiple paths from different autonomous systems (ASes) and use them for load balancing. Without this, the BGP process might consider only one path and mark others as hidden.

Incorrect Statements:

A. You need to configure as-override:AS-override is used to replace the AS number in the AS-path attribute to prevent loop detection issues in MPLS VPNs, not in a typical eBGP IP fabric setup.

C. You need to configure loops 2:There is no specific BGP command loops 2 relevant to resolving hidden routes in this context. It might be confused with allowas-in, which is used to allow AS path loops under certain conditions.

Data Center References:

Proper BGP configuration is crucial in IP fabrics to ensure route propagation and to prevent routes from being marked as hidden. Configuration parameters like next-hop self and multipath multiple-as are common solutions to ensure optimal route installation and load balancing in a multi-vendor environment.

Understanding the Configuration:

The configuration shown in the exhibit involves an EVPN (Ethernet VPN) setup using BGP as the routing protocol. The export policy named CHANGE_NH is applied to the BGP group evpn-peer, which includes a rule to change the next hop for routes that match the policy.

Issue with Next Hop Not Changing:

The policy CHANGE_NH is correctly configured to change the next hop to 203.0.113.10 for the matching routes. However, the next hop remains unchanged when advertising EVPN routes to the peer 203.0.113.2.

Reason for the Issue:

In Junos OS, when exporting routes for VPNs (including EVPN), the next-hop change defined in a policy will not take effect unless the vpn-apply-export parameter is used inthe BGP configuration. This parameter ensures that the export policy is applied specifically to VPN routes.

The vpn-apply-export parameter must be included to apply the next-hop change to EVPN routes.

Correct Answer Explanation:

D. The vpn-apply-export parameter must be applied to this peer:This is the correct solution because the next hop in EVPN routes won't be altered without this parameter in the BGP configuration. It instructs the BGP process to apply the export policy to the EVPN routes.

Data Center References:

This behavior is standard in EVPN deployments with Juniper Networks devices, where the export policies applied to VPN routes require explicit invocation using vpn-apply-export to take effect.

Understanding VRF and Routing Instances:

In an EVPN-VXLAN overlay network, multiple tenants are separated using unique VRF (Virtual Routing and Forwarding) instances. Each VRF instance maintains its own routing table, allowing for isolated routing domains within the same network infrastructure.

Role of Route Distinguisher:

Route Distinguisher (RD):The RD is a unique identifier used in MPLS and EVPN environments to distinguish routes belonging to different VRFs. The RD is prepended to the IP address in the route advertisement, ensuring that routes from different tenants remain unique even if they use the same IP address range.

Correct Property:

D. the route distinguisher value:This is the correct answer because the RD is crucial in determining which routing information belongs to which VRF instance. It ensures that each VRF’s routing table only contains relevant routes, maintaining isolation between tenants.

Data Center References:

The RD is a key element in MPLS and EVPN-based multi-tenant environments, ensuring proper routing segregation and isolation for different VRFs within the data center fabric.

Scenario Overview:

In the exhibit, Host A is trying to resolve Host B's IP address (10.10.1.2) through ARP (Address Resolution Protocol). Normally, an ARP request would be broadcasted over the network, and the host owning the IP address (Host B) would respond.

Role of Proxy ARP:

Option A:Proxy ARPallows a router or switch (in this case, leaf1) to respond to ARP requests on behalf of another host. Leaf1, knowing the MAC address of Host B through the EVPN MAC advertisement, can reply to Host A's ARP request directly without broadcasting the request across the entire network fabric. This feature reduces unnecessary traffic and increases network efficiency.

Conclusion:

Option A:Correct—Proxy ARP enables leaf1 to respond to Host A's ARP request for Host B's IP without broadcasting over the IP fabric, thus providing the ARP response locally.

Controlling Traffic Within a Tenant's Network:

The requirement is to limit access to specific traffic types within a tenant’s network without routing all tenant traffic through a firewall. This requires a selective method that can direct specific types of traffic to different paths based on the nature of the traffic.

Filter-Based Forwarding (FBF):

FBF is a technique that allows for routing decisions based on filters applied to the traffic, such as matching on source IP addresses, destination IP addresses, or even specific application types (like HTTP or FTP). This allows specific types of traffic to be forwardedto a specific next hop (e.g., a firewall) without affecting the entire traffic flow within the tenant's network.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—Filter-based forwarding allows for granular control of traffic, ensuring that only specific types of traffic within the tenant's network are redirected through a firewall, satisfying the requirement.

Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Routing in EVPN-VXLAN:

Symmetric Routing:Traffic enters and exits the VXLAN network through the same VTEP, regardless of the source or destination. This approach simplifies routing decisions, especially in large networks, and is generally more scalable.

Asymmetric Routing:The routing occurs on the egress VTEP. This method can be simpler to deploy in smaller environments but becomes complex as the network scales, particularly with larger numbers of VNIs and VLANs.

Correct Statements:

C. Symmetric routing supports higher scaling numbers:Symmetric routing is preferred in larger EVPN-VXLAN deployments because it centralizes routing decisions, which can be more easily managed and scaled.

D. Asymmetric routing routes traffic on the egress switch:This is accurate, as asymmetric routing means the routing decision is made at the final hop, i.e., the egress VTEP before the traffic reaches its destination.

Incorrect Statements:

A. Symmetric routing needs an extra VLAN with an IRB interface for each L3 VRF instance:This is not accurate. Symmetric routing does not require an extra VLAN per VRF; rather, it uses the same VLAN/VNI across the network, simplifying routing and VLAN management.

B. Asymmetric routing is easier to monitor because of the transit VNI:Asymmetric routing is not necessarily easier to monitor; in fact, it can add complexity due to the split routing logic between ingress and egress points.

Data Center References:

The choice between symmetric and asymmetric routing in an EVPN-VXLAN environment depends on network size, complexity, and specific operational requirements. Symmetric routing is generally more scalable and easier to manage in large-scale deployments.

Understanding the Scenario:

In an EVPN-VXLAN environment, when using multi-homing in active/active scenarios, there's a risk that a multihomed server might receive duplicate copies of Broadcast, Unknown unicast, and Multicast (BUM) traffic. This is because multiple VTEPs might forward the same BUM traffic to the server.

EVPN Route Types:

Type 4 Route (Ethernet Segment Route):This route type is used to advertise the Ethernet Segment (ES) to which the device is connected. It is specifically used in multi-homing scenarios to signal the ES and its associated Ethernet Tag to all the remote VTEPs. The Type 4 route includes information that helps prevent BUM traffic duplication in active/active multi-homing by using a split-horizon mechanism, which ensures that traffic sent to a multihomed device does not get looped back.

Explanation:

The Type 4 route is crucial for ensuring that in a multi-homed setup, particularly in an active/active configuration, BUM traffic does not result in duplication at the server. The route helps coordinate which VTEP is responsible for forwarding the BUM traffic to the server, thereby preventing duplicate traffic.

Data Center References:

Type 4 routes are essential for managing multi-homing in EVPN to avoid the issues of BUM traffic duplication, which could otherwise lead to inefficiencies and potential network issues.

MAC Move Limiting:

MAC move limiting is a security feature used in network switches to detect and mitigate rapid changes in MAC address locations, which could indicate a network issue or an attack such as MAC flapping or spoofing.

When a MAC address is learned on a different interface than it was previously learned, the switch can take various actions to prevent potential issues.

Available Actions:

A. drop:This action drops packets from the MAC address if it violates the move limit, effectively blocking communication from the offending MAC address.

D. log:This action logs the MAC move event without disrupting traffic, allowing network administrators to monitor and investigate the event.

E. shutdown:This action shuts down the interface on which the MAC address violation occurred, effectively stopping all traffic on that interface to prevent further issues.

Other Actions (Not Correct):

B. filter:Filtering is not typically associated with MAC move limiting; it generally refers to applying ACLs or other mechanisms to filter traffic.

C. enable:This is not an action related to MAC move limiting, as it does not represent a specific reaction to a MAC move event.

Data Center References:

MAC move limiting is crucial for maintaining network stability and security, particularly in environments with dynamic or large-scale Layer 2 networks where MAC addresses might frequently change locations.

Understanding Network Architectures:

ERB (Edge Routed Bridging) architecture involves routing at the network's edge (leaf nodes), while traffic between leaf nodes is switched. This is commonly used in VXLAN-EVPN setups.

Analysis of the Exhibit:

The exhibit shows configurations related to routing instances, VXLAN, and VLANs, with VNIs being used for each VLAN. This setup is characteristic of an ERB architecture where each leaf device handles Layer 3 routing for its connected devices.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—The configuration shown corresponds to an ERB architecture where routing occurs at the network's edge (leaf devices).

 Understanding the Problem:

Host1 (10.1.1.1) is failing to communicate with Host2 (10.1.2.1) within an EVPN-VXLAN environment using ERB architecture.

 Analysis of the Exhibit:

The provided output includes information from the show route forwarding-table matching command for IP 10.1.2.1. The next hop is shown as vtep.32769, which indicates that the traffic destined for 10.1.2.1 is being forwarded into the VXLAN tunnel with the correct VTEP (VXLAN Tunnel Endpoint).

 Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—The traffic from Host1 is entering the VXLAN tunnel, as evidenced by the next hop pointing to a VTEP. However, the issue could lie elsewhere, possibly with the remote VTEP, routing configurations, or the receiving leaf/spine devices.

Understanding sFlow Monitoring:

sFlow is a packet sampling technology used to monitor traffic in a network. It sends sampled packet data and interface counters to an sFlow collector, which analyzes the traffic patterns.

Information Included in sFlow Datagram:

Option A:The datagram sent to the sFlow collector includes information about the interface through which the packets entered the agent (the switch or router). This is crucial for understanding where in the network the traffic was captured.

Option D:sFlow datagrams also include the source and destination VLAN for the sampled packets. This allows for detailed analysis of the traffic flow within different VLANs.

Conclusion:

Option A:Correct—The ingress interface is included in the sFlow datagram.

Option D:Correct—The source and destination VLANs are also included, providing context for the sampled traffic.

Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP):

ZTP allows for the automated configuration of network devices, like QFX Series switches, without manual intervention. During ZTP, a switch will obtain its configuration from a DHCP server and then download the required software and configuration files from a specified server (e.g., FTP, HTTP).

DHCP Server Configuration:

Option B:The DHCP server needs to know theMAC address for each QFX5120to provide a specific configuration based on the device identity. By mapping the MAC address to a particular configuration, the DHCP server can ensure that each switch gets the correct configuration.

Option D:Themanagement IP address for each QFX5120must also be assigned by the DHCP server. This IP address allows the device to communicate on the network and access the configuration files and other required resources during the ZTP process.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—MAC addresses allow the DHCP server to identify each QFX5120 and assign the appropriate configuration.

Option D:Correct—Management IP addresses are essential for network communication during ZTP.